UK Crypto Casinos with No KYC: What to Know

→

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in GB

Fast payouts

18+ Only

The guide explains UK licensing, BCH payments and withdrawals, and the limits of no-KYC claims at casinos serving British customers.

What the UK Licensing Position Means for BCH Casinos

The phrase “UK crypto casino” can describe a site aimed at people in Britain, but it does not establish that the operator holds a British gambling licence. The relevant distinction is between the market a casino serves and the regulatory system under which it operates. A site can accept customers in the UK while remaining outside the UK Gambling Commission’s licensing framework.

The Commission regulates commercial gambling in Great Britain, including remote casino gambling offered to consumers there. Its jurisdiction does not depend on where an operator’s servers or other key equipment are located. It is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain, issuing operating licences to businesses and personal licences to individuals working in regulated roles. A remote operator offering gambling to British consumers is required to hold the relevant Commission licence.

This framework has a direct consequence for cryptocurrency. UK-licensed operators are prohibited from accepting cryptocurrency, so a casino offering Bitcoin Cash as a direct payment method is not operating as a UKGC-licensed casino. Descriptions such as “safe crypto casinos UK” can therefore obscure an important difference: a site may be accessible from Britain without being licensed to serve the British market. The word “UK” in a brand description or promotional claim is not proof of Commission authorisation.

Casinos That Accept Upaycard in the UK

Offshore casinos sit outside the UKGC regulatory system. A specialist review that discusses BCH casinos has described the operators it covers as holding Curacao or similar offshore licences. That is a report about the particular sites reviewed, not a guarantee that every offshore casino has the same licence, or that a licence remains current. An offshore licence is not a UKGC licence and does not provide the protections attached to participation in the British regulatory framework.

The distinction also matters for complaints. UKGC-licensed casinos must provide an internal complaints process and access to an approved Alternative Dispute Resolution service. An offshore BCH casino does not provide access to the UKGC complaints route or UKGC dispute resolution through an approved ADR service. If a disagreement arises, the Commission cannot resolve it through the complaints arrangements for its licensees. The operator’s own terms and any processes associated with its offshore jurisdiction are separate from UKGC oversight.

Anonymous Crypto Casinos in the UK: What to Know

There is a similar limit to self-exclusion. A casino accepting BCH without a Commission licence is not part of GAMSTOP. Registration with that scheme therefore does not block access to such a site in the way it applies to participating UK-licensed operators. This is a material difference in the available safety net, not a technical detail about payment choice. Offshore players also do not receive UKGC regulatory safeguards simply because they live in Britain or use a UK-based device.

The legal position of the individual player should not be confused with the operator’s licensing obligations. UK law does not criminalise individuals for gambling with an offshore casino. That does not turn an offshore operator into a UK-licensed business, nor does it make the arrangement equivalent to gambling with a licensed site. The obligation to hold a Commission licence applies to operators offering remote gambling to consumers in Great Britain; the absence of criminal liability for the player does not remove that regulatory distinction.

The Commission’s public register is the reference point for confirming whether a business holds a UK remote casino licence. A name appearing on an offshore licence or in a casino’s own description is not a substitute for a current UKGC entry. Age verification is also required before an operator allows a customer to deposit funds into a gambling account. These requirements are part of the regulated framework; offshore sites do not become UKGC-regulated by adopting individual practices that resemble those of licensed operators.

For anyone assessing a BCH casino, the central question is therefore not merely whether the site accepts customers in Britain. It is whether the operator appears on the Commission’s register and falls within the UKGC system. If it does not, the player has no UKGC complaints route, no approved ADR access through the Commission, and no GAMSTOP integration. Offshore gambling by an individual is not criminalised, but the UKGC regulatory safety net is absent. Subsequent questions about BCH payments, account checks and cashouts concern how offshore operators function; they do not alter this licensing position.

Regulatory Warning

Offshore BCH casinos operate outside the UKGC framework, meaning players have no access to the UKGC complaints route, approved ADR services, or GAMSTOP integration.

Our top casino picks for the UK

1. Britsino
   Bonus: Welcome Package – Get your £2,200 + 2,000 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
2. EvoSpin
   Bonus: 125% up to €2500 + 125 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
3. Chanze
   Bonus: Slots Welcome Bonus #1 200% up to €500 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
4. SlotoSport
   Bonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
5. Jetsetspins
   Bonus: 200% Bonus + 100 Free Spins + Free Royal Wheel · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
6. Dieselwin
   Bonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
7. Revery Play
   Bonus: 100% up to€1,000+ 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
8. WinBeast
   Bonus: €5000 + 500 FS + €650 Freebet · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
9. NightWin
   Bonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days

Bitcoin Cash Deposits and Withdrawals

At an offshore casino that accepts Bitcoin Cash, payment generally moves between a player’s crypto wallet and the casino’s wallet. The casino supplies a deposit address, and the player sends BCH to it. Once the transaction is broadcast, it is recorded on the Bitcoin Cash network; the casino then credits the account according to its own confirmation policy. The same basic process operates in reverse when a withdrawal is sent to a wallet address.

This differs from entering card or bank details into a payment form: the transfer is made from a crypto wallet, and the destination address matters. A mistyped or otherwise incorrect address can prevent the funds reaching the intended account. The casino’s displayed deposit instructions and the transaction details in the sending wallet are therefore central to the process. The casino may show a pending status while it waits for the network confirmation it requires.

A specialist review reports that BCH casino deposits commonly receive one on-chain confirmation, with that confirmation taking 10 minutes. This is a reported processing pattern, not a guaranteed arrival time. Network activity and the operator’s own crediting procedure can affect when a deposit appears as playable balance. A transfer visible on the blockchain may therefore not yet have been credited to the casino account.

Withdrawals involve a casino-side step before the network transfer begins. A player submits a request and supplies or selects a destination wallet address; the operator must process the request and broadcast the payment. The time spent in that internal queue is separate from the time needed for the transaction to be confirmed on-chain. A prompt network transfer does not establish that the casino will approve or send every request immediately.

Cardano ADA Casino Comparison UK: Licensing Limits

A specialist review also reports that several casinos place withdrawals above an operator-set threshold into a “management review” queue. The thresholds described range from 0.5 BCH to the equivalent of 2 BCH. These are reported examples of differing operator policies, not a single industry-wide limit. A review can therefore affect the interval between submitting a cashout request and the casino sending BCH. The threshold and the handling of a request depend on the operator’s terms and procedures.

For a transfer in either direction, the transaction record can help distinguish a network delay from an account-crediting or operator-processing delay. A transaction identifier can be checked against the public blockchain to see whether the transfer has been broadcast and confirmed. That record does not, by itself, explain why an operator has not credited a deposit or completed a withdrawal; those steps are controlled by the casino.

These mechanics apply to offshore crypto casinos, not to UK-licensed casino payments. An offshore casino is outside the UKGC regulatory safety net: its customers do not have access to UKGC dispute resolution or an approved alternative dispute resolution service, and the site is not integrated with GAMSTOP. Playing offshore is not criminalised for individuals in the UK, but the absence of those protections remains relevant if a deposit is delayed, a withdrawal is held for review, or a payment dispute arises.

BCH Deposit Process

Step 1: Obtain Address

The casino supplies a specific BCH deposit address to the player.

Step 2: Transfer Funds

The player sends Bitcoin Cash from their crypto wallet to the provided address.

Step 3: Network Confirmation

The transaction is broadcast and recorded on the Bitcoin Cash network.

Step 4: Account Crediting

The casino credits the player’s account balance according to its own confirmation policy.

The practical distinction is between the blockchain transfer and the casino’s handling of the account balance. BCH must be sent to the correct destination, while crediting and withdrawal approval remain subject to the operator’s process. A confirmation time reported by a specialist review describes the network stage; it should not be treated as a promise about the full time required for a casino payment.

Why BCH Is Not a Direct Payment Option at UK-Licensed Casinos

Bitcoin Cash is not a direct deposit option at casinos licensed by the UK Gambling Commission. The Commission’s public register of remote casino licences contains no operator listing BCH as a deposit method, and no UK-licensed casino currently accepts it as a direct payment method. This separates offshore sites that may take BCH from casinos operating under a Great Britain licence.

The distinction is regulatory, not a technical limitation of the cryptocurrency. A casino’s payment methods are part of how it provides gambling services, and UK-licensed operators are prohibited from accepting cryptocurrency. As a result, searching for a crypto online casino in the UK may bring up offshore services, but it does not indicate that a British-licensed casino has added BCH or another cryptocurrency to its cashier.

The Commission’s register is relevant because it identifies businesses licensed to provide remote casino gambling in Great Britain. Checking whether an operator appears there can establish whether it holds a UKGC licence; it does not make an offshore casino licensed simply because that site accepts British customers or displays prices in pounds. For BCH specifically, the current register gives no indication of a licensed operator offering direct deposits in the currency.

UK Casinos That Accept Boku and Pay by Phone

A casino that accepts Bitcoin Cash may therefore be accessible from the UK while remaining outside the UKGC system. Offshore gambling by individuals is not criminalised, but accessibility should not be confused with equivalent oversight. Players using an offshore BCH casino do not have the UKGC regulatory safety net, the UKGC complaints route or access to an approved alternative dispute resolution service. Such sites are also not integrated with GAMSTOP.

That difference matters when a payment or account dispute arises. A UKGC-licensed casino must provide an internal complaints process and access to an approved ADR service; an offshore casino does not provide those UKGC channels. Its own terms and the arrangements under its offshore licence may still apply, but they are not a substitute for UKGC dispute resolution. The same distinction applies to self-exclusion: an offshore BCH casino is not part of GAMSTOP.

This does not mean every offshore site has identical practices or that the term “crypto casino” establishes a particular licence status. The payment method alone cannot verify who operates a site or which regulator, if any, supervises it. For a UK-licensed casino, the Commission’s public register is the relevant reference point; for BCH availability, the present register shows no direct-payment option among its remote casino licensees.

The result is a narrow but clear market distinction. An online casino that accepts crypto may be available to a UK resident, yet it is not thereby a UK-licensed casino. Conversely, a casino holding a UKGC remote casino licence cannot accept BCH directly under the current prohibition on cryptocurrency payments. This applies whether the search concerns BCH casino games, slots or live casino products: the game format does not change the payment restriction.

UK-licensed operators are prohibited from accepting cryptocurrency, which is why Bitcoin Cash is not available as a direct payment method at UKGC-licensed casinos.

Accordingly, a request for a mobile crypto casino or another online crypto casino in the UK describes a type of service that may be found offshore, not a payment option available at UKGC-licensed casinos. The register’s current position is specific to Bitcoin Cash: no listed remote casino operator names it as a deposit method, and no UK-licensed casino accepts it directly. The regulatory and complaints protections attached to a UKGC licence should therefore not be assumed when a site takes BCH.

BCH Transaction Speed, Cost and Traceability

Bitcoin Cash can make cryptocurrency payments to a casino more economical and quicker than Bitcoin, but those advantages describe the network in general, not a guaranteed outcome for every transaction. They also do not make BCH private. Its practical trade-off is therefore between comparatively favourable transaction performance and a public record that can sometimes be linked to identifiable activity.

The difference from Bitcoin is associated with BCH’s block capacity: its block size limit is 32MB. This allows BCH transactions to be processed more quickly and at lower cost in typical comparisons with Bitcoin. For someone considering a crypto casino that accepts BCH, those characteristics may make the payment method less burdensome than Bitcoin for moving funds on the network.

Casinos That Accept Diners Club in the UK

That comparison should not be read as a promise of a fixed fee or completion time. Network conditions and the handling of a particular payment can affect the experience, and the broad comparison does not establish what a specific casino will charge or how quickly it will credit an account. The network’s relative speed and cost are one part of the process; the casino’s own procedures are another. A favourable BCH transaction does not, by itself, establish that an operator processes payments promptly.

The larger block limit is a capacity feature, not a privacy feature. BCH transactions are recorded on a blockchain that is publicly accessible. The record can expose transaction details and connections between addresses, even when an address does not display a person’s name. This distinction matters: a pseudonymous address is not the same as an untraceable payment.

Chain analysis firms can sometimes follow a deposit’s path and connect it with a known exchange. If cryptocurrency has passed through an exchange associated with an identifiable account, that connection may help link an on-chain address to a person or organisation. The extent to which a particular transfer can be attributed will depend on the available data; the public record does not automatically reveal the identity behind every address. Still, BCH should not be treated as a way to erase the transaction trail.

This is relevant across crypto casino deposits, not only BCH. A casino may advertise a wallet-based payment option or describe its account process as requiring little information, but neither description changes what is recorded by the blockchain. Network visibility and a casino’s identity checks are separate issues. A transaction can remain publicly inspectable whether or not the casino asks for conventional documents.

Do

• Use BCH for lower transaction costs compared to Bitcoin
• Check public blockchains via transaction identifiers to track transfers

Don’t

• Assume BCH payments are anonymous or untraceable
• Confuse network confirmation speed with the casino’s crediting time

The comparison with Bitcoin is therefore narrow but useful. BCH generally offers a speed and cost advantage tied to its larger block capacity, while transactions remain visible on a public ledger and may be traced back to an exchange. Neither point settles whether a particular crypto casino is suitable; that depends on matters beyond the payment network, including the operator’s terms and applicable protections. Nor does lower transaction cost mean that every payment is free, or that a casino’s own charges and processing rules disappear.

For UK players looking at casinos that accept cryptocurrency, BCH’s network characteristics should be assessed separately from claims about privacy or account access. Its relative efficiency can be a practical advantage over Bitcoin, but it does not make a payment anonymous.

Bonus Terms at Bitcoin Cash Casinos

Promotions at offshore Bitcoin Cash casinos are commonly structured as deposit matches rather than cash credited without conditions. Specialist casino reviews describe welcome offers matching between 100% and 200% of a deposit, with wagering requirements of 20x to 50x the bonus amount. These figures describe offers reported in those reviews, not terms that apply to every casino or remain fixed over time.

A deposit match is not equivalent to withdrawable cash. The terms may require qualifying bets before bonus funds or related winnings can be withdrawn. The basis of the wagering calculation matters: a multiple of the bonus alone produces a different total requirement from a multiple of the deposit and bonus combined. Any stated maximum cashout, eligible games, expiry conditions and restrictions on withdrawals can also affect the practical value of an offer. The headline percentage, by itself, therefore gives an incomplete account of what a crypto casino welcome bonus provides.

Casinos That Accept MiFinity in the UK: Payment Guide

The UKGC rule is distinct. A Commission update states that, from 19 December 2025, wagering requirements on bonuses offered by licensed operators are capped at 10x. That cap applies within the UK licensing framework; it does not set terms for an offshore casino accepting BCH. Offshore promotions should not be treated as if they carry the same UKGC rules or protections. In particular, their bonus conditions do not provide access to UKGC dispute resolution or an approved alternative dispute resolution service.

No-deposit bonuses appear less often at BCH casinos than at traditional UK sites, according to specialist casino reviews. Those reviews also describe such offers as carrying high wagering requirements and a low maximum cashout. “No deposit” refers to the absence of an initial qualifying deposit, not necessarily to unrestricted winnings or immediate withdrawal. Where a promotion is presented as a crypto casino no-deposit bonus, its value depends on the attached conditions, including whether winnings can be withdrawn and what steps must be completed first.

Likewise, “no wagering” in a promotion’s label should not be taken as a complete description of its terms. The wording needs to be read alongside any withdrawal restrictions or other conditions. A no-wagering claim does not, on its own, establish that every bonus-related balance can be cashed out without limits.

These distinctions apply whether an offer is associated with Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum or another cryptocurrency. Searches for real-money crypto casinos in the UK may bring up promotions for crypto slots, but the currency and game type do not determine how a bonus is calculated or whether it is withdrawable. A useful comparison of casino reviews should therefore separate the advertised match from the wagering basis, cashout cap and eligibility rules, while distinguishing offshore offers from promotions governed by the UKGC cap.

Deposit Matches

Welcome offers typically ranging from 100% to 200% of the deposit amount.

Wagering Requirements

Commonly set between 20x and 50x the bonus amount at offshore casinos.

No-Deposit Bonuses

Less frequent offers often characterized by high wagering requirements and low maximum cashouts.

BCH Cashout Times and Withdrawal Reviews

A BCH cashout time is measured from the withdrawal request, not from the deposit that funded play. Specialist review reports have described BC.Game and Stake as processing BCH withdrawals within ten minutes of a request, with many reported payouts taking less than five minutes. These are observations reported for those operators, not a guaranteed service standard or evidence that every withdrawal follows the same timetable.

A fast reported payout should not be treated as a promise of immediate access to funds. The time recorded in a review may reflect particular transactions and account circumstances; it does not establish how a different request will be handled. Nor does it demonstrate that every stage, from submitting a request to the funds arriving in a wallet, will take the same length of time. Operator procedures can change, so the report is best read as an account of observed performance rather than a standing commitment.

Some specialist reviews also describe casinos placing withdrawals above an operator-set amount into a “management review” queue. The thresholds cited in those reports range from 0.5 BCH to the equivalent of 2 BCH. This is not a single rule shared across BCH casinos: the trigger depends on the operator, and a threshold reported for one site should not be assumed to apply elsewhere. Where a review is triggered, the quick cashout times reported for smaller or otherwise routine requests may not describe the outcome.

Casinos That Accept Monzo in the UK: What to Check

The distinction matters when comparing an advertised crypto casino with an actual withdrawal experience. A stated processing time may not explain how the operator handles a request subject to additional review, while a reported threshold does not by itself establish how long that review will take. Neither figure should be treated as a universal feature of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrency casinos. The reported figures concern BCH cashouts at named operators and particular review practices, not Bitcoin, Dogecoin or BNB withdrawals generally.

These reports also do not change the position of an offshore casino in the UK market. Playing at an offshore casino is not criminalised for individuals, but an operator without a UK Gambling Commission licence does not provide the UKGC regulatory safety net. Its customers do not have access to UKGC dispute resolution or an approved Alternative Dispute Resolution service, and such a casino is not integrated with GAMSTOP. A quick cashout report is therefore evidence about a reported payment experience, not assurance of UK regulatory recourse if a withdrawal is delayed or disputed.

What “No KYC” Does—and Does Not—Mean

“No KYC” generally describes a casino’s account-opening process, not complete anonymity. A specialist review reports that some offshore Bitcoin Cash casinos permit registration with an email address and password, without the traditional identity checks at signup. That account setup does not establish that the operator will never ask for further information, or that activity linked to the account cannot be identified.

Attention: "No KYC" typically refers only to the initial registration process and does not guarantee that identity checks will never be requested or that payments are anonymous.

The distinction matters because Bitcoin Cash transactions are recorded on a public blockchain. Chain analysis firms can often connect a casino deposit to a known exchange, where the wallet may be associated with an identifiable customer. An email-only account therefore does not conceal the transaction trail itself. Nor does it prevent an exchange or another party with relevant records from linking activity to a person.

The label also says nothing by itself about the operator’s status in Great Britain. Remote gambling offered to British consumers requires a UK Gambling Commission licence, and a site operating outside that system does not provide the UKGC regulatory safety net. Offshore casino players do not have access to the UKGC complaints route or approved alternative dispute resolution, and a site without a Commission licence is not integrated with GAMSTOP. Individuals are not criminalised simply for gambling offshore; that does not make an offshore operator UKGC-licensed or give its customers those protections.

Age verification remains a separate issue from identity checks described as KYC. Operators must verify a customer’s age before allowing a deposit. The phrase “no KYC” should not be read as evidence that age requirements do not apply, or as a promise that every later interaction will proceed without checks.

This distinction also limits what can be inferred from claims about anonymous play, bonuses, games or rapid payouts. The account-opening description alone does not verify the terms of a promotion, the availability of particular games, or the time taken to release a withdrawal. Those are separate features, and none follows from the absence of traditional checks at registration. In practical terms, reduced signup friction is not equivalent to untraceable payments, guaranteed privacy or UKGC dispute protection.

Casinos That Accept Neosurf in the UK: What to Check

Offshore Gambling and UK Tax Treatment

The legal position of an individual using an offshore gambling site is distinct from the duties imposed on the operator. UK law does not criminalise individuals for gambling offshore. That does not make an offshore casino equivalent to a UK-licensed service: operators offering remote gambling to consumers in Great Britain are required to hold a UK Gambling Commission licence.

This distinction matters when assessing a cryptocurrency casino serving UK customers. Someone’s use of a site is not, by itself, a criminal offence, but offshore players do not have the UKGC regulatory safety net. They also lack access to UKGC dispute resolution and an approved alternative dispute resolution service, and the site is not integrated with GamStop. These are material differences from the protections attached to a UK-licensed casino accepting cryptocurrency.

Tax treatment is a separate question. The general position described in the available guidance is that gambling winnings are not subject to UK income tax or capital gains tax, whether the winnings are paid in pounds or cryptocurrency. On that account, a gain from gambling does not become taxable simply because it is held as Bitcoin Cash or another digital asset.

There is, however, a stated disagreement about what happens when cryptocurrency winnings are later converted into pounds. One position says gambling winnings remain outside income and capital gains tax regardless of currency; another distinguishes the original winnings from a gain arising when the cryptocurrency is disposed of, which may be subject to capital gains tax. The distinction is between the gambling result and any change in the asset’s value before conversion. The two positions should not be collapsed into a single categorical claim that every conversion is tax-free.

For online cryptocurrency casinos used by UK residents, therefore, the individual’s legal exposure and the tax status of winnings are not the same issue. Offshore gambling is not criminalised for the player, while the operator’s licensing obligations remain. The general tax treatment of gambling winnings is favourable, but the sources described here differ on whether a later increase in the value of BCH can create a separate taxable gain. Anyone making a material conversion decision may need advice based on their circumstances; the existence of an offshore casino does not itself settle that tax question.

Wallet-Based Accounts and Large BCH Withdrawals

A wallet-based account links casino activity to a Bitcoin Cash wallet rather than relying solely on conventional payment methods. At casinos operating outside a UK Gambling Commission licence, deposits commonly use this model, and identity checks may be limited. That arrangement does not, by itself, establish that a casino is legitimate or make the account anonymous: the casino’s own rules still govern access to funds and withdrawal handling.

Large cashouts can be treated differently from routine account activity. A specialist review reports that some casinos place withdrawals above an operator-set threshold into a “management review” queue. The thresholds it identifies range from the equivalent of 0.5 BCH to 2 BCH. This is not a universal rule: the amount that triggers review, and how the operator handles it, can vary. The review may therefore affect when funds are released, even where the account is wallet-based.

The wallet connection should not be mistaken for a guarantee of immediate access to a balance. A casino can apply account checks or review a withdrawal under its terms, and the precise process depends on the operator. Before using a low-deposit crypto casino or a crypto roulette casino, the relevant distinction is not merely whether BCH is accepted, but whether the withdrawal conditions are clear and what happens when a larger amount is requested.

Casinos that accept bank cheques in the UK

In Great Britain, online gambling is legal only with an operator holding the required UKGC licence. Offshore gambling by an individual is not criminalised, but an offshore casino does not provide the UKGC regulatory safety net, UKGC dispute resolution or access to an approved alternative dispute resolution service. It also has no GamStop integration. A wallet-based account does not replace those protections.

No-KYC Claims, Plinko Searches and What the Evidence Supports

“ No KYC” can describe a sign-up process that asks for little information at the outset, but it should not be read as proof that an account will never face identity checks. Nor does the label establish that a casino is suitable for UK players or that its claims about verification are independently confirmed.

The same caution applies to Plinko. The fact that a casino advertises cryptocurrency or a minimal-registration process does not establish that it offers Plinko, or that a particular Plinko game is available there. Availability and account conditions can change, so neither the game nor a no-check policy can be inferred from a broad marketing description.

Anonymity has a separate limit at the payment-network level. Bitcoin Cash transactions are recorded on a public blockchain. Chain-analysis firms can often link a casino deposit to a known exchange, so using BCH does not make the payment untraceable. A casino account created with limited personal details does not alter that public record.

There is also a material difference between using an offshore casino and using a UKGC-licensed one. Offshore gambling by individuals is not itself criminalised in the UK, but offshore players do not have the UKGC regulatory safety net, access to UKGC dispute resolution or an approved alternative dispute resolution service, or GamStop integration. These limitations remain relevant even where a site describes itself as no-KYC or promotes Plinko.

Responsible Gambling

Prepared by the Rhino Casino editorial staff.